Movies: Fences and a few quick thoughts on the Oscar nominations


The acting in Fences is superb and all the accolades coming Denzel Washington and Viola Davis’s way are well deserved. They can get all the Oscars in the world as far as I’m concerned. The problem I had with the film is that it was a play up on the big screen. After awhile, this very long film (2 hours and 19 minutes) got to me with all the talking. At least on stage, there would have been an intermission to break it up. I am somewhat surprised that the screenwriters did not create more of a story as opposed to giving us what I assume was pretty much word for word the over 25,000 words of the play. I would have preferred that along with the important soliloquies and major dramatic moments of the play, that there had been some flashbacks or other techniques to engage us in the story.

That being said, there are so many powerful moments in this film that in conjunction with the acting makes it one of the better movies of the year. Viola Davis being able to cry and have snot coming from her nose at the same time is an Oscar winning performance if I ever saw one. I think it is difficult to take a play and make it work on the big screen and this one has its issues but along the way, there is some glorious dialogue and amazing acting.  It is well worth seeing.

A Few Quick Thoughts on the Oscar Nominations:

The Positives:

  • Lucas Hedges for Manchester by the Sea – he is amazing
  • Much more diverse set of nominations which are all well deserved
  • By and large, the best films and performances are being honored

The Strange:

  • No Amy Adams for best actress? She has been nominated by every other major group and deserved a nod
  • Thought Hugh Grant would have received a nomination for Florence Foster Jenkins. His performance was deserving and recognized by the other major groups
  • Deadpool clearly did not resonate with the old white Oscar voters – too bad
  • No Taraji P. Henson? Great job in Hidden Fences

My Wish list – Outside possibilities that I wished for

  • Viggo Mortensen got his Best Actor nomination but would have loved to see Captain Fantastic get a best picture nod
  • Would have loved for Sonny Pawar to have been nominated for “Lion”. He made the movie
  • Wasn’t going to happen but I thought Chris Pine was better than Jeff Bridges in Hell or High Water
  • My favorite foreign films of the year both came from New Zealand and weren’t nominated – “Hunt for the Wilderpeople” and “The Dark Horse”



Movies: Hidden Figures


Hidden Figures in conjunction with Loving provide a history lesson that everyone should  be aware of. The two films take place in roughly the same timeframe in Virginia and show what life was like in a segregated state not so long ago. In addition, Hidden Figures reminds us of what women had to face in the workplace prior to the equal rights movement. The film’s story of how three brilliant young African-American women helped the USA send men into space and win the race with the Russians is nothing short of inspiring.   These women had so much to overcome yet persevered and succeeded.

We are first introduced to Katherine Gobel Johnson as a child math genius in West Virginia. A jump in time and she (Taraji P. Henson) and her friends (Octavia Spencer as Dorothy Vaughn and Janelle Monae as Mary Jackson) work in the “Colored Computer” division of the Langley research center in Hampton Roads Virginia. It is called the computer division because this was a time when people who were really good at math on adding machines were called computers. The film takes place in the early 60s, everything is completely segregated in Virginia and NASA’s Space Task Group is no exception. The Engineer in charge, Al Harrison (played by Kevin Costner) needs someone with knowledge of Analytic Geometry and Johnson (then Gobel) is sent over. To say her reception by a bunch of white guy engineers was frosty would be an understatement.

These three women all had brilliant minds and despite continual discrimination slowly become appreciated by some in NASA. Kevin Costner’s character is under intense pressure to get an American into space after the Russians launched both Sputnik and Yuri Gagarin. He is focused on calculating all of the requirements for launch, orbit and reentry and he comes to appreciate Johnson, the “human computer” and breaks down barriers so that he can maximize her knowledge to achieve his goals. Nothing is easy for her in this environment, including her having to run 1-½ miles to the “colored” bathroom every time she needs to relieve herself and Harrison helps remove these obstacles. He also showcases Johnson to the military brass and ultimately John Glen refuses to go into space without her calculations which proved to be critical to his mission’s success.

Dorothy Vaughn realizes that her group of African-American mathematicians is going to be rendered useless as the first IBM mainframes are brought in and teaches herself Fortran and how to use the computer. She is able to retrain all of her employees and they become instrumental in the successful conversion to computers. Mary Jackson breaks barriers in her pursuance of an Engineering degree having to convince a judge to allow her to take the required courses at an all white high school.

Everyone should see this movie to appreciate the history as well as the present day implications. I think my only critique of the film is the lack of character development of the Vaughn and Jackson characters as well as Johnson’s husband Jim played by an under-used Mahershala Ali. It would have been nice to have them as flushed out as Johnson.  The acting is solid by Henson, Costner, Spencer and Ali but Janelle Monae really excells as Mary Jackson. It has been a great year for her with parts in Moonlight and Hidden Figures and she shined bright in both. The score by Hans Zimmer and Pharrell Williams is great and I still have “Runnin” repeating in my head.  See this movie!

Movies: La La Land, Weiner and the Best of 2016

Awards season is in full swing and I’m trying to get to as many of the potential Oscar nominations as possible over the next few weeks. Here are two along with what I thought were the best movies of 2016.

La La Land

I really liked La La Land. Did I love it? No. Do I think it should win Best Picture? No. Should everyone see it? Probably. The first and third acts are the best. The middle drags and I confess I did nod off during that part, but this homage to the great musicals of the past has many moments of brilliance and the last 10 minutes are stunning.  La La Land (LA land) is the story of Mia (Emma Stone) and Sebastian (Ryan Gosling) struggling to find their respective success in LA. Mia is an actress keeping herself alive by being a barista and Sebastian (Seb) is a jazz musician hoping to open his own club. In the meantime he plays the piano for anyone who will hire him.

The movie starts out on a high note with a wonderful sequence on a gridlocked LA freeway. There is at least a five-minute singing and dancing routine as one by one, the occupants of the cars get out to join in. Mia and Seb first encounter each other at the end of the number and enjoy a few other chance meetings before love blossoms. The middle part of the movie follows their respective career struggles as they also try to create and maintain a lasting relationship. The main theme of the movie is clearly the price of following one’s dreams and ambitions and it is woven throughout the film.

I won’t give away the end, as it is bittersweet and pretty much perfect. It is one I want to see again because I know I missed things. I’m not a big musical person so this homage to the great ones of the past is pretty much lost on me, but I do know that Gosling and Stone are no Astaire and Rodgers. Their acting, however, is flawless and every accolade they are getting is well deserved. Before the awards season finishes, everyone should see Manchester By the Sea, Moonlight and La La Land.


Weiner is now streaming on multiple platforms and I must have been pretty desperate for something to watch on TV because I decided to check it out. I guess my excuse is that it is being nominated by many groups for Best Documentary so in my attempt to see as much as I can before the Oscars, I saw it. “Weiner” is essentially the story of his ill-fated mayoral campaign after a self-imposed exile from politics following his first sexting scandal. The filmmakers seemingly had full access to Weiner and his wife Huma Abedin as the film unfolds and Weiner looks as if he is going to make a major comeback as he runs for mayor.

This all falls apart completely when a 23 year-old woman announces she and Weiner had a long sexting history. It is shocking that the Weiners continued to allow the filmmakers to film the resulting disastrous impact on both the campaign and the personal relationship of the couple. What is even more amazing is that Huma continued to stay with him until after the film had been released. It was only after a worse sexting scandal erupted this summer that she left him. Weiner is a narcissist with big problems and this film gets to the heart of his personality as it traces what the filmmakers saw as his final fall from grace little knowing what was to come after. “Weiner” is an excellent documentary if you can stand the subject matter.

The Best of 2016

In the spirit of Awards Season, I’m going to provide a list of what I thought were the best movies I saw this year in no particular order. They are all worth checking out!

Manchester by the Sea


La La Land


Hunt for the Wilderpeople


The Lobster

Hell or High Water

O.J. Made in America


Love and Friendship

The Dark Horse (not to be confused with “Dark Horse” which is supposed to be very good but I didn’t see)

I also want to give a shout out to three movies that had elements of greatness, particularly acting, but weren’t very fun to watch.

Elle (for the amazing performance of Isabelle Huppert)

Certain Women (for the acting – particularly Kristin Stewart and Lily Gladstone)

Birth of a Nation (particularly the acting but also the history)

Finally, I haven’t yet seen Hidden Figures or Fences, which likely would have landed up on this list.

Movies: Lion and Elle

There are a lot of movies with Oscar buzz currently playing in theaters and the holiday period is a great time to catch up on them.  Here are my thoughts on two of these award contenders.


You will like this movie.  The acting is great; the cinematography breathtaking; the true-story unbelievably compelling and the haunting musical score compliments every scene.  The movie is essentially comprised of two distinct parts.  The first is the story of a five-year-old Indian boy Saroo played brilliantly by Mumbai native Sunny Pawar.  It is his engaging personality, adorable facial expressions and remarkable acting skills that suck you into the film from the get go.  I’m not sure that without Sunny playing this part, that the audience would be as engaged going into the slower second part of the film which depicts Saroo as an adult.

Saroo is just five when he is separated from his older brother one night and falls asleep on a train that takes him more than 1000 miles from his Indian village.  He becomes a street child in Calcutta, living under intolerable conditions and unable to speak the language or remember the name of his village. Every scene of this young boy being carried away from all that he knows is gut wrenching. Eventually, he is put into an orphanage and ultimately adopted by an Australian couple played by Nicole Kidman and David Wenham (Faramir in LOTR). Kidman gives a particularly compelling performance as this story obviously resonated with her real life adoption experience.

The second half of the film focuses on the adult Saroo played very well by Dev Patel.  This part of the movie moves at a much slower pace as Saroo tries to come to terms with his origins. Saroo remembers an amazing amount of detail about his Indian home and when introduced to Google Earth, begins a virtually impossible search for his origins in hopes of finding his mother and brother.  The film doesn’t rely on sentimentality and saves the true emotional moments for the end where you can’t help but be moved by an amazing outcome.

I liked a lot about his film but particularly the relationship Saroo has with his adopted mother and the fact that he doesn’t abandon her for his birth mother in India.  I also appreciate that the Director doesn’t make this a tear jerker from the onset – he could have – and waits for the final moments of the film for us to wipe a few happy tears away.  This movie will particularly tug at the heartstrings of anyone who has ever been a parent and I’m glad that the Director didn’t focus on Saroo’s birth mother’s reaction to losing her five-year-old child which would be a different and devastating story.  As 2016 closes out, it is nice to have an uplifting story and Lion is a movie all should enjoy.


Elle is one of those movies that you won’t be able to stop discussing long after the credits roll.  It is a psychological thriller that twists and turns and blows up your assumptions as to what is happening throughout the movie.  As a woman, I was particularly conflicted by the rape scenes and the motivations of the victim as the film progressed but it made more sense to me with a surprise ending.  This is not a happy movie so beware.

Michele is a co-owner of a small gaming company when she is sexually assaulted by an intruder in her home as her cat watches.  For some reason, she does not report the crime to the police.  We next see Michele interacting with her young,  predominantly male employees and telling them that a game depicting the rape and brutalization of a woman needs to be more “orgasmic”.  The degree to which Michele enjoys brutal sex becomes grey as are the dysfunctional relationships with all the men in her life as Michele goes about her daily activities seemingly undistracted by what has happened to her. Ultimately it proves to be a “cat and mouse” game of the highest order.

The movie continues with more sex and brutality as we watch Michele interact with her ex-husband, current lover (and best friend’s husband), son and even her rapist.  She is in a car accident and injured but neither calls the police or goes to a hospital which explains a lot about her and her feelings toward authority.  I’m never happy when rape is used as a plot device and this movie will make you squirm and feel uncomfortable.  It is not a film to enjoy but it is a movie to watch Isabelle Huppert as Michele command the screen from beginning to end as Michele.  She is magnificent as the standoffish woman who the camera never leaves for entire 2 hours and 20 minutes length of the film.  I have never seen Huppert act but wow, she was utterly amazing in this movie.

The end of the film was a surprise to me (maybe not to others) and explains a lot about her motivations but the entirety of this film experience will leave you exhausted.  Elle is a tough movie to watch but seeing Huppert’s performance made it worthwhile for me.  Elle didn’t make the last Oscar cut for best foreign film but hopefully Huppert will be nominated.   Both have been nominated for awards this season by other organizations.




Movies: Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them 

I am a huge Harry Potter Fan and so there was never any question that I would see Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. I thoroughly enjoyed the movie although not as much as the actual Harry Potter films. This story takes place about 100 years before Harry and is set in NYC. Eddie Redmayne plays Englishman Newt Scamander, a curious soul who houses a lot of very bizarre magical creatures packed in a small suitcase he carries with him. Mr. Scamander is the author of one of Harry’s textbooks which is to no one’s surprise about magical beasts.  Newt travels to NYC in hopes of obtaining a new creature but his existing ones escape in a series of incidents and he spends most of the movie trying to round them up.

David Yates is the Director and he did several of the Potter films. Once again he proves a worthy steward of Rowling’s imagination and delivers very good special effects, terrific sets and rich cinematography. Eddie Redmayne as the shy tousled hair Newt is charming but his potential love interest, Katherine Waterston doesn’t seem to have any chemistry with him. Dan Fogler does a nice job as the muggle Newt picks up along the way. Colin Farrell is excellent as the evil Graves and Johnny Depp puts in a cameo at the end of the movie. Apparently he has a much more significant role in the next one.

You don’t have to have seen the other Harry Potter films to understand and enjoy what is going on in Magical Beasts but it does help. The villain is the evil wizard Grindelwald whose backstory was detailed in the “Deathly Hallows” and it helps to know something about him including his “sign” of the Deathly Hallows. The movie sheds light on the American Wizard legal and educational structure along with it’s governing body, which will be new to Potter audiences filling in gaps about the Wizarding world beyond British soil. The depths of Rowling’s intricate backstories never ceases to amaze me.

For adults who are into Harry Potter, I’d see the movie. For those adults who aren’t going to see the movie with children, I’d suggest you see the original Harry Potter films, which other than the Deathly Hollows Part 1 and the Chamber of Secrets are better than this film. This movie is perfectly enjoyable but in my opinion, it lacks the magic of the originals. This may in part be because while Jo Rowling is a brilliant writer, this, her first attempt at screen writing, is not as strong. I’m a bit worried about how we are going to get four more movies out of this series but if Jo has five movies about Newt in her head, I’m willing to give her the benefit of the doubt.




Movies: Loving


Loving is the true story of Richard and Mildred Loving, a mixed race couple who lived in rural Virginia in 1958. Richard and Mildred enjoyed a slow life revolving around car mechanical and local jalopy races in a rural Virginia town where there seemed to be quite a lot of interaction between blacks and whites. Mildred becomes pregnant and because it was illegal for the couple to marry in Virginia, they drove to Washington D.C for their license. Upon their return to Virginia, they were arrested and as part of a plea deal, agreed not to come back to Virginia in each other’s company for 25 years. They moved to D.C. for a few years but Mildred hated the city and did not want to raise her three children there. They returned illegally to Virginia and hid out in the country while working with an ACLU attorney who ultimately took their case to the Supreme Court.

Joel Edgerton and Ruth Negga are both wonderful as the Lovings. The film is quiet and subdued and does not focus on the actual Supreme Court case but rather the story of a couple just trying to live together as a family in Virginia. There isn’t a lot of passion in the relationship, which dragged the film down in my opinion. The cinematography, set design and acting are all excellent but I wanted a deeper look into their story. In particular, I would have preferred that there was a little more detail around the legal case, which culminated in the 1967 landmark case prohibiting states from outlawing interracial marriage.   To think these discriminatory laws were in existence during my lifetime is sobering and the story of the Lovings is an important one to bring to the screen.  I recommend the movie.

Movies: Hacksaw Ridge and Dr. Strange worth seeing


Dr. Strange

The perfect antidote to Tuesday’s election was to rush out on Wednesday and see Dr. Strange – a Superhero movie full of special effects that stretched out over a non-depressing, non-thinking, fast-paced two hours. I knew nothing of Dr. Strange going in other than it stars Benedict Cumberbatch who can pretty much do no wrong in my book. Unfortunately, the show I went to was in 3D which made it a bit trippy but nonetheless, I sat back and was entertained for a couple of hours on a difficult day.

Dr. Strange is an egotistical surgeon who has an accident that renders him unable to operate. He seeks healing help from a guru in Nepal (the Ancient One) played by Tilda Swinton. Through his studies, he gains magical powers and confronts the film’s villain played by Max Mikkelsen with mind boggling fight scenes. Also playing one of Dr. Strange’s new associates is Chiwetel Ejiofor who was great as was Rachel McAdams who played the love interest. I enjoyed all of the actors in this film immensely and thought they did a perfectly fine job in what were generally non-demanding roles.

The special effects were amazing and a bit like “Inception” meets an Escher painting – lots of fun with really beautiful geometric shapes floating through time and space. I was truly entertained from the beginning to the end of the film. This movie does not require any knowledge of the comics but will probably not be that interesting to those who don’t like the better Marvel movies (e.g. Ironman or Avengers) or at least good Sci Fy. For me, it was a perfect way to spend a couple of hours being transported to a different reality.

Hacksaw Ridge

Hacksaw Ridge is a good movie. I haven’t seen may Mel Gibson films but the ones I have seen revel in violence and gore with a strong “good guy v bad guy” theme. Hacksaw Ridge is no exception. The first half of the movie is the story of Desmond Doss, a boy from Lynchburg, VA who grows up with an abusive alcoholic father. When Pearl Harbor is attacked, he and his brother enlist along with all of their friends. Desmond is a 7th Day Adventist and refuses to touch a gun in basic training, which gets him a court martial. His Sargent played by Vince Vaughn (with a strange comedic smirk throughout the film) tries to make his life miserable, as do those in his unit in order to force him to quit. Doss remains in the army through a somewhat suspicious resolution of his case and becomes a hero in the end by rescuing 75 soldiers at the Battle of Hacksaw Ridge on Okinawa becoming only one of three Conscientious Objectors to win the Medal of Honor.

The acting is fine in this film. Andrew Garfield is believable as Doss and does a perfectly decent job as the doe-eyed Desmond. Hugo Weaving as Desmond’s father is really good and the soldiers in Doss’s unit are all well cast with perhaps the exception of Vince Vaughn who I just found sort of strange and not at all the type of Sargent that I would expect in the Army.

If you are looking for subtlety or grey areas in this film, you won’t find them. It’s not Gibson’s style. Also, in Gibson fashion, the movie seems to be unduly violent and gruesome surpassing even Saving Private Ryan in my opinion. There are times when he slows down the motion while building up the music to create an over the top scene. There are also some “bleeding over” of Gibson’s religious beliefs at the end where we see a couple of scenes suggesting a “Baptism” and an ascendency to heaven. With all that being said, we can thank Mr. Gibson for bringing this story to millions of Americans who will now know who Desmond Doss is. It is an important story that is well told by Mr. Gibson.









Movies: Certain Women and Captain Fantastic


Certain Women

Whenever you have an almost 40% difference between the Critics Score and the Audience Score on Rotten Tomatoes, you know there is a big problem with the movie being reviewed. That is definitely the case with Certain Women, which has a 90%, Critics Score and a 53% Audience Score. The Critics obviously found much more than the audience in this art-house film starring Laura Dern, Michelle Williams and Kristin Stewart.  I really admire the work of these three actresses and they were quite good in this film but it wasn’t enough to cause audiences to enjoy this slow burning Indy. Some of disparity in scores might be attributed to the fact that this is a chick flick and RT is dominated by males but even the “chicks” I know who have seen the movie didn’t care for it.

The film is adapted from a series of short stories. It has a couple of very loose connections between a couple of characters but basically the stories stand-alone. All three take place around Livingston Montana as winter closes in on this small town. The first stars Laura Dern as an attorney unable to help a client with a workplace injury because he had already signed away his rights. He becomes violent and she deals with it in a compassionate but distant way. The second story is about Gina (Michelle Williams) and her husband who are building a house outside the town and their teenage daughter. This is the least flushed out plot of the three as we learn virtually nothing about the source of her flawed family relationships or why this causes Gina to pursue getting a pile of sandstone for her house. The final story is the best and depicts Kristin Stewart as an attorney (Beth) who takes a gig teaching school law to some teachers in a town four hours away. She meets a young woman played by Lily Gladstone who is mesmerizing in her role as a caretaker for farm horses that becomes enamored by Beth and seeks a relationship with her.

The power of this movie is showing uncertain women going about their daily lives in quiet desperation without achieving the respect they should from their families and business relationships. The Director gives us just a quick glance into these lives without providing any kind of history or resolution to their stories. The first story is ok with Laura Dern lovely to watch as she struggles with her existence. The second story is the weakest but the third story about unrequited love is moving due primarily to the understated acting of Gladstone in a breakthrough performance. Stewart plays her role perfectly and again reminds us how far she has come since Twilight. The cinematography is fantastic as it captures the bleakness of winter descending on this bleak Montana town. Kelly Reichardt , the Director, has created a quiet, subtle film with beautiful scenery, wonderful acting and a plot that will cause most people to go running away from the theater in pain.

Captain Fantastic

I missed this terrific film this summer due to my schedule but it is now available on Video on Demand through all the regular services. This is a movie, unlike Certain Women, that the critics and the audience completely agree on and they all like it. It is the story of Ben, played by Viggo Mortensen who is bringing up his children in the Pacific Northwest wilderness. They hunt, read whatever they can and eschew traditional religions, modern society and Corporate America. Ben’s wife has been institutionalized for mental illness and subsequently commits suicide, which sets the story in motion. He takes his kids to their mother’s funeral in New Mexico and his wife’s family is not particular welcoming of his alternative lifestyle and threaten to take the children away.

Ben has to deal with his uncompromising personality when it becomes clear that his lifestyle choices have a negative impact on at least some of his children and his wife. Mortensen is superb in this role which he displays the conflicting emotions of tenderness, fierceness and an unyielding dedication to his philosophy. Also great is George MacKay who plays his eldest son Bo. You may remember him as Billy in Pride. The rest of the kids are also quite good. Of course the supporting cast of Frank Langella, Ann Dowd, Kathryn Hahn and others are all heavy hitters who nail their small but important parts. The ending of the film doesn’t quite hold together as there is no reason to believe that Ben’s wife’s family isn’t going to further pursue him but other than that, Captain Fantastic is a great little film that just about everyone should enjoy.


Movies: A Man Called Ove, Birth of a Nation and USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage


A Man Called Ove

This really nice little film from Sweden has a number of things going for it but it is not particularly unique nor will it be a foreign film Oscar contender. It is the story of Ove, an old curmudgeon who lives by himself and is the self appointed policeman for his Swedish neighborhood. He is fired from his job after 43 years, seemingly has no friends and it quickly becomes clear that he is a widow who is trying to commit suicide in order to join his  beloved wife. Things are not going well for Ove and even his suicide attempts fail.

A new family moves in next door and slowly Ove becomes friends with the extroverted Persian wife played by Bahar Pars. He teaches her to drive and is slowly integrated into her family. Ove (Rolf Lassgard) and Pars are the stars of the movie. Their back and forth dialogue and meaningful glances to each other are great and ultimately culminate in a sequence where Ove actually laughs. It takes a bit of time to get into this movie but flashbacks fill in the gaps of Ove’s life including his marriage to Sonja as well as his childhood as we gain an understanding of the events that make Ove the man he is.

In a predictable ending, Ove is loved and admired by many and a few tissues will be needed for the last scenes. The book has been a staple of many a book club and the movie hits a soft spot for all. It is well done, has some nice moments of humor despite the generally dark satire nature of the film and should be a hit with US audiences despite the sub titles. 

Birth of a Nation

When Birth of a Nation premiered at Sundance last February, it immediately generated Oscar buzz as well as being advertised as the answer to the “Oscar so White “controversy. There was so much hype it sold for an extraordinary $17.5M and then the roof fell in this spring, as decades old rape charge against the Director/Actor/Writer Nate Parker became widely known. The director has addressed charges that he and Jean McGianni Celestin, who share a “story by” credit with Parker, sexually assaulted a classmate in 1999, when all three were students at Penn State University. Parker was acquitted while Celestin spent time in jail before his conviction was overturned. The accuser took her own life in 2012.

Birth of a Nation was likely a bit overhyped as Sundance winners often are. Without the controversy surrounding the Director, it probably would have faded as an Oscar contender over the course of year as the general consensus is that this is a very good albeit not great film. There are many questionable decisions by the director – especially where historical records are involved. The Nat Turner that was projected in the film seems strangely laid back. This doesn’t jive with other historical representations of a fiery preacher. There are other flaws with it which should be expected with a first time Director including transitions, a bizarre angel and slaves hanging from trees in what was likely meant to be an “art” shot.   In short, it isn’t 12 Years a Slave but it is hard to expect that level with a first movie.

Despite these issues, the film represents a period of history that people should be aware of. I doubt many viewers out there are familiar with William Styron’s the Confessions of Nat Turner written over 40 years ago so they may well not be knowledgeable of the violent rebellion led by Nat Turner. There is plenty of brutality in this film and a disturbing couple of rape scenes that were used as plot devices to help change Nat from a mild mannered preacher to a revengeful mass murderer. Much has been written lately about using rape as such a device in numerous TV shows and the questionable need for it. I’m not sure the use of violence against the female characters worked effectively in this film and was particularly uncomfortable due to the rape allegations against Parker.

This film won’t be for everyone as the subject matter is tough and the violence difficult to watch but it is a well-done movie that is a promising start for Nate Parker.  

USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage

I have been waiting for this movie to come out for a while. It is about the Indianapolis, the ship that delivered a portion of the Atomic Bomb to Tinian during WWII and then on its way home was sunk by a Japanese sub. You may remember the story being told by Quint to Brody in Jaws. The Indianapolis is very important to our family as my husband’s uncle died in the tragedy and it has been a source of many a school report by my son. The men in our family have read every book on the sinking of the Indianapolis.

The movie, starring Nicholas Cage, was supposed to be released on Memorial Day but was postponed even though it was done. All of a sudden, it showed up on VOD so we rented it. It still might be distributed to theaters this fall with a rumored premier on Veteran’s Day. Even though it is never a good sign that a movie goes straight to VOD, I was hopeful that it wasn’t that horrible. My husband bailed after 15 minutes, cursing it out. I stuck through the 130 minutes despite the fact that it is really dreadful. After all, I paid $10 on ITunes for this travesty so was determined to see it through to the end.

The movie starts out with a special effect sequence that looks like a teenager on his IPhone could have filmed it. There couldn’t have been any kind of a budget for the film. And don’t even get me started on the sharks. I would have thought that they be able to do better than what was in Jaws forty years ago but I could have been watching a Sharknado movie. But even worse is the screenplay. There is a ridiculous love story, contrived racial issues, sailors spitting into their captain’s food for no reason and just a bunch of gibberish that makes no sense. And that’s in the first 25 minutes. It was even hard to tell that the Japanese soldiers were in a cramped sub rather than a spacious hotel. In addition to the special effects and the screenplay, the acting is pretty bad as well. Nicholas Cage is dreadful. Did we ever think he could act?

The men of the Indianapolis and their families deserve a lot better than this. Do not waste your time or money if it comes to a theater near you and certainly don’t shell out $9.99 to see it on demand.




Movies: Two new films that deliver a message about life and love


Little Men

A well-known movie critic said about this movie (rated 97% on Rotten Tomatoes) “the most remarkable thing about Ira Sach’s richly textured new film “Little Men” is how it manages to be about so much, and yet so little”.   I think this sums up the movie perfectly. On the surface, it is about the collateral damage of gentrification but simmering below is a story about  love, friendship, coming of age and the complexity of life where decisions bring difficult outcomes for everyone involved.

Jake Jardine’s grandfather dies and his family inherits a Brooklyn apartment located in an area of escalating property values and containing a small dress shop on the first floor.   They move in to the apartment above the shop and Jake (Theo Taplitz), a very introverted child with artistic abilities, becomes friends with the extroverted Tony (Michael Barbieri), the son of the dressmaker. There are beautiful scenes between the two as their friendship deepens and becomes the focus of their adolescent lives. The Director does a wonderful job of filming them travelling around Brooklyn, Tony on a scooter and Jake on roller blades, or playing video games with not a word passing between them.

Things take a turn for the worse when it turns out that the dressmaker has been charged very low rent by the grandfather and Jacob’s father (a strong performance by Greg Kinnear), a struggling actor, and his sister who have inherited the property need money.   They go after a more market rent for the property, which creates serious tension between the two families. The boys are not allowed to go to each other’s homes and as a result, Jake and Tony give the silent treatment to their parents with unintended consequences.

I won’t give away the end but suffice it to say that this movie represents a slice of real life and the emotions of all involved are realistic as is the film’s ending. Life is a series of tough events for most of us and certainly is for the families in this film.   If you get a chance to see this movie, take it. The acting is first rate, particularly the work of the boys, and journey the Director takes you from the first scenes until the final one is wonderful. It may be a story about “so little” but it gives us so much.


The Hollars

There is nothing new in this predictable story about a completely dysfunctional family (some with quirks that will irritate you) but it tugs at your heart and there is some great acting. The critics weren’t kind to it (48% on Rotten Tomatoes) but the audience score is almost double that which goes to show that regular people like this movie.

John Krasinski directs and acts in the film. He plays “John” son of “Don” brother of “Ron” (really?) who is a mid-thirtyish graphic artist living in NYC in a relationship with a pet clothes designer played by Anna Kendrick. They are about to become parents but John isn’t really ready to commit. John also appears to have some unresolved feeling towards his hometown girlfriend. For a guy in his thirties, John appears to be overwhelmed by his entry-level job, his girlfriend, impending fatherhood and life in general. When John’s mother becomes seriously ill in any town USA, his girlfriend puts him on a plane and he returns home.

Turns out John is the cream of the crop among the males of the family. His older brother Ron is unemployed, stalks his ex-wife and is generally pretty creepy. His father, played by the wonderful Richard Jenkins, is facing bankruptcy and cries about everything – Jenkins may be accused of being a little over the top here. The star of the family (and the movie) is Margo Martindale who plays the mom who keeps them all together. Her acting is suberb and makes every one in a scene with her better for it. She makes this movie worthwhile and worth seeing.

As I said, there isn’t anything original in this movie and you will leave with a couple of characters that you never want to see again but it is a solid “B” movie with some real feel good moments and you will likely enjoy it. Don’t go in to it thinking it is a comedy. It is a drama with some comedic moments (more at the beginning than the end) that delivers a strong message about family and relationships that will resonate with most.